Filed in archive
MOVIE MATTERS
by jim on April 10, 2006

There are strong rumors that Gwyneth Paltrow was paid a staggering 3.6 million bucks for a three-minute cameo in the upcoming movie, "Infamous."
Holy mackerel is the only way I can express my reaction by using publishable words!
If this is true it has to be the most outlandish payment ever made, to anyone, for anything.
Supposedly the stipend was so huge because Paltrow sang a song during her appearance.
Think about it, that's 1.2 million per minute, which is $20,000.00 per second!
If you make $100,000.00 per year, and like me, you probably don't even come anywhere close to that, Paltrow would have earned as much in 5 seconds, less time than it takes to blow your nose.
This has to be an all time record for hourly earnings for all of mankind, for any endeavor.
Maybe the movie will be the greatest flick of all time, but frankly, I think moviegoers should boycott it if this report is true.
Meanwhile, Paltrow has been named "Britain's Best Dressed Woman" by Harper's Bazaar .
I guess so; she's certainly got the money for the best clothes, or are they free, in exchange for a mention of the designer's name?
Isn't that the way these things work, those who can afford the most, pay the least, or nothing?
Trackback: http://publish.creative-weblogging.com/publish/mt-tb.pl/19776
Mr Wong
Vote for GWYNETH PALTROW GETS $3.6 MILLION FOR QUICKIE:
|
Rating: 6.90 out of 10 vote(s) cast.
|
Response from:
Razib Ahmed
(04/10/06 4:02pm)
That is a hugeeee sum of money. I wonder what Gwyneth Paltrow will do with this money? May be she will pay a bonus to her agent to motivate him/her to try to get another such offer for her.
Subscribe
Use the search to look for other interesting posts
| RSS | See all blog subscribe options |
|
What is RSS? | |
| Yahoo! |
|
| Addthis |
|
| Bloglines |
|
| Newsletter | |
| Follow us on Twitter! |







